ABSTRACT
Introduction: Korean autistic persons who have endured an integrated secondary education system have been exposed to school bullying, causing trauma and stigma to them. It also blocks them from entering a tertiary education system and a decent work, resulting in a lower quality of life. However, research on how it affects autistic persons has not yet been conducted in Korea. Methods: Fourteen adult autistic persons in the Republic of Korea participated in the semi-structured focused group interviews. Their conversations were analyzed through qualitative coding. Results: The interview results show the rare voice of Korean autistic people. Although interviewees experienced physical, verbal, and sexual violence against them during the secondary education period, they could not get substantial assistance from schools and society. Interviewees agreed that bullying is inherent in the secondary education system of Korea, even in Korean culture. They experienced the cause of bullying being attributed to them as victims rather than perpetrators, and impunity is given to the bullying assailants. Early analyses of this article confirm that such experiences are combined with the sociocultural climate of elitism, meritocracy, and authoritarianism in the Republic of Korea. Conclusion: The study confirmed that the autistic person's bullying experience does not come from the social inability of autistic people but the "profound" competition and discriminative atmosphere of the society. The result urges further studies on the bullying experience of East Asian autistic persons and the construction of Korean intervention strategies to prevent school violence against Koreans with disabilities, especially autistic pupils.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: To compare the cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs. myocardial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with stable intermediate risk chest pain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Non-acute patients with 10-90% pre-test probability of coronary artery disease from three high-volume centres in Korea (n = 965) were randomized 1:1 to CCTA or myocardial SPECT as the initial non-invasive imaging test. Medical costs after randomization, the downstream outcome, including all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular accident, repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis, and significant bleeding following the initial test and the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained by the EuroQoL-5D questionnaire was compared between the two groups. In all, 903 patients underwent the initially randomized study (n = 460 for CCTA, 443 for SPECT). In all, 65 patients underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in the CCTA and 85 in the SPECT group, of which 4 in the CCTA and 30 in the SPECT group demonstrated no stenosis on ICA [6.2% (4/65) vs. 35.3% (30/85), P-value < 0.001]. There was no difference in the downstream clinical events. QALYs gained was higher in the SPECT group (0.938 vs. 0.955, P-value = 0.039) but below the threshold of minimal clinically important difference of 0.08. Overall cost per patient was lower in the CCTA group (USD 4514 vs. 5208, P-value = 0.043), the tendency of which was non-significantly opposite in patients with 60-90% pre-test probability (USD 5807 vs. 5659, P-value = 0.845). CONCLUSION: CCTA is associated with fewer subsequent ICA with no difference in downstream outcome. CCTA may be more cost-effective than SPECT in Korean patients with stable, intermediate risk chest pain.
